Useless Black politics and child poverty

00_brucedixonThere have never been more Black elected and appointed officials, more Black corporate and military functionaries, or more Black faces on TV and in the movies than there are right now.

There’s been a Black family in the White House for seven years already and the first lady is from the South Side of Chicago.

But what does it really mean to Black children in places like Chicago’s South Side all around the country? The plain and simple answer is, “Not a whole lot.”

Current census data pegs the percentage of African-American children under 6 who are growing up in poverty at 38 percent. That’s three out of every eight Black children in the U.S.  It’s been just a little higher once or twice in the several decades that particular statistic has been kept, but never by much, and not since the early 1980s.

Politics isn’t just about voting, elections and political parties. Politics broadly speaking is about how we humans arrange our collective affairs.

And Black politics – as far back as anybody can recall – has never been aimed at confronting those who wield power, or contesting for that power. Black politics has always been about representation, about which Black faces would best serve as designated spokespeople for the rest of us. It’s been which of them might best broker for our interests, and brokers don’t contest power.

The current waves of mass incarceration and gentrification would have been impossible without the active collaboration of large groups of Black preachers, Black business leaders and Black politicians, the kind of Black political class which views its own glittering careers as the indisputable proof that something great is being accomplished on behalf of the oppressed.

So far, the newest wave of so-called “movement activists” are walking down that same well-traveled road. They’re asking for more representation, with themselves as the brokers this time. They want town hall meetings and to their own presidential debates.

No demands
But as Glen Ford points out, they don’t have demands.

They’re not proposing abolition of the crushing burden of student and consumer debt.

They’re not championing laws that would make the kinds of mortgage fraud perpetrated by the big banks illegal, or which would let cities snatch underwater homes from the speculators.

They’re not educating or organizing parents and communities to resist the wave of school privatizations or to opt out of the standardized testing which provides the fake justification for them.

They’re not speaking or mobilizing against the permanent warfare state which swallows fully half the nation’s revenue – money which could be spent transforming cities, industries, economies, and tens of millions of lives.

They’re not building new political organizations that value and practice democracy internally, that prefigure the world we deserve.

Lots to say
This new movement crowd has lots to say about the slippery nebulous demons of White supremacy and institutional racism, but almost nothing against the state and corporate actors who exercise real power.

Like the classes of broker-leaders before them, they don’t have answers to gentrification, or the housing crisis or mass incarceration, or much to say to the three out of every eight Black children in poverty.

They can only point to their own careers – while declaring how they love their Blackness – and that of the pretty first lady in the White House.

Bruce Dixon is managing editor of Contact him at


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here