Justices weigh challenge to open-carry ban

ADVERTISEMENT

BY JIM TURNER
THE NEWS SERVICE OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE – Law-abiding Floridians should be allowed to openly carry firearms in public, a gun-rights groups argued Wednesday to the Florida Supreme Court on behalf of a man arrested four years ago while strolling with a visibly holstered weapon in Fort Pierce.

Florida Carry attorney Eric Friday said the state’s nearly 30-year-old concealed-weapons law violates the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment, which he said requires people to be allowed to openly carry guns. Lawmakers this year considered a proposal to allow people with concealed-weapons licenses to openly carry firearms, but the bill did not pass.

Citizens ‘deprived’
“Quite frankly, the Legislature at this point has deprived citizens of the substantive right to bear arms,” Friday said as some justices appeared skeptical of his argument.

Justices Barbara Pariente and Peggy Quince questioned how the current state law allowing citizens to receive concealed-weapons licenses to carry firearms suppresses gun ownership.

“This isn’t a ban,” Pariente said. “It’s just a ban on the method of carrying that the Legislature has determined protects public safety more than people walking around like they’re in the wild west. “

Florida Carry is representing Dale Norman, who was arrested in February 2012 for openly carrying a gun in a holster. Norman, then 24, had recently received a concealed-weapons license – something that 1.57 million people now possess, according to the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.

Fine, court costs
Norman challenged the constitutionality of the law, but was unsuccessful in lower courts. A trial judge imposed a $300 fine and court costs on Norman.

Norman appealed to the Fourth District Court of Appeal in West Palm Beach, which in February 2015 agreed with the trial court that the state law “does not improperly infringe on Florida’s constitutional guarantee, nor does it infringe on the ‘the central component’ of the Second Amendment – the right of self-defense.”

Friday, the Florida Carry attorney, tried to make a comparison that regulating firearms is akin to imposing rules against journalism, which would violate the First Amendment.

“This court would never stand for the idea of a training class, a fee and a 90- or maybe even a 180-day wait in order for a person to get a license to get a camera to be a photojournalist,” Friday said.

Chief Justice Jorge Labarga was quick to dismiss the comparison. “I don’t think journalists’ cameras kill people,” Labarga said.

ADVERTISEMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here