The indecency of the ‘Black Misleadership Class’

When Rep. Barbara Lee made the House vote for sanctions against Russia, Iran and North Korea unanimous, she snuffed out the last flicker of any independent worldview among the Black political (misleadership) class.

“Russiaphobia” reigns supreme in the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), where “Auntie” Maxine Waters, who once blamed the CIA for the crack cocaine epidemic, now fills her rhetorical pipe with war-inducing hallucinogens straight from spook headquarters in Langley.

Three summers ago, the CBC joined in a unanimous House resolution in support of Israel, effectively cheering the apartheid state at the very moment it was slaughtering 2,500 Palestinians in Gaza.

Standing with Israel
A month before the resolution on Israel, 80 percent of the CBC voted to continue the Pentagon’s massive transfers of weapons and military gear to local police departments, thus endorsing the militarized police occupation of Black communities.

The “War” (Democratic) Party began its absorption of the CBC in 2002, when corporate and pro-Israel moneybags funded the primary election defeats of Representatives Cynthia McKinney of Georgia and Earl Hilliard of Alabama, two of the Caucus’ most prominent critics of US foreign policy. It was a pivotal year in the devolution of Black electoral politics, as corporate money made its first serious entrance into local Black Democratic races.

By 2005 there existed, for the first time ever, a recognizable right wing in the CBC. Once a small faction, these corporatists now dominate the Caucus, where only 8 to 10 members can be considered reliably “progressive” by any rational measure – and only if foreign policy is omitted from the criteria.

No difference
When it comes to US behavior overseas, the Black Misleadership Class is indistinguishable from the leadership of the Democratic Party. Their core ideology is “representationalism,” which holds that the best measure of Black progress is the number of “Black faces in high places” in all sectors of US society.

This narrow worldview meshes quite well with corporate notions of “diversity,” with its emphasis on managerial and high-profile public positions. For Black corporate- and media-oriented climbers, social transformation need go no deeper than skin color.

Radical change in fundamental relations of power is viewed, at best, as problematical, since serious socio-economic shakeups might upset the fragile status of those Blacks newly entered the fringes of ruling circles (or who imagine themselves to have “arrived.”) The Black representationalist worldview is, therefore, inherently conservative at its core.

On domestic issues, Black elected officials and other “leaders” must at least give the appearance of responding to mass Black demands for some form of wealth redistribution. This is generally accomplished by paying lip service to the mildest economic reforms offered by the Democratic wing of the corporate duopoly.

‘The best deal’
The Black political class, however, assigns its highest priority to its own relationship to Power, which it conflates with the interests of Black people as a group. They are instantly prepared to accept the harshest reversals in social policy – and then package it as “the best deal we could get.”

Welfare “as we knew it” was abolished and mass Black incarceration more deeply entrenched, with hardly a “God Damn!” from the Black Misleadership Class.

At this stage of capitalist decay, the rulers are not prepared to offer anything to the masses – and especially not in any form that could be directly beneficial to Black people. White backlash must be avoided at all costs. Accordingly, the Black Misleadership Class asks only for a gentler austerity.

Gone are the days of ritual, election-season proposals for a “Marshal Plan for Black America.”

Such a program is more desperately needed than ever, but Black politicos will make no demands that corporate Democrats would reject, for fear of harming their standing in “the party” and with the billionaires that control it.

In foreign relations, including Africa, the Black Misleadership Class identifies fully with the US imperial project, and seeks to embed itself as deeply (and profitably) as possible in the infrastructure of empire. As per their imperative that Black people be “represented” in all US endeavors, African-American politicos applaud the posting of Black generals to AFRICOM, but are unconcerned that the US Military Command virtually occupies the continent.

Doesn’t care
This class cares nothing for the sovereignty – or even survival – of African peoples and nations, but seeks only to ensure that the hyper-aggressive superpower presents a “rainbow” face as it attempts to dominate the world: diversity in predation – and in genocide.

No one has been more intimately involved in the ongoing slaughter of Congolese over the past 21 years than Susan Rice, who was serving as special assistant to President Bill Clinton and senior director for African affairs in 1996, when the U.S.-backed militaries from Rwanda and Uganda invaded the Democratic Republic of Congo. To date, the invaders have caused the deaths of at least 6 million people, the largest genocide since World War II.

Much of Congo’s mineral wealth has wound up in Rwanda, on its way to multinational corporations. Under President Obama, Rice became US ambassador to the United Nations where she did everything possible to shield Rwanda and Uganda (and, ultimately, US imperialism) from censure and punishment for the crime of genocide.

These were precisely the credentials that put Rice at the top of the list to succeed Hillary Clinton as secretary of state. Predictably, Republicans zeroed in on Rice – not, of course, for her crimes against Congolese humanity, but to make her a foil for the jihadist attack on the US consulate (a CIA arms distribution depot) in Benghazi, Libya.

Defending genocide?
The CBC rallied to Rice’s defense, embracing her as a sister in distress. Thanks to Friends of Congo and other activists, all these Black lawmakers had been made aware of the abominations committed by US allies in Congo, and of the US role in covering up their crimes during Rice’s tour at the UN. A handful had served on congressional subcommittees on Africa. But 6 million dead Congolese were of no consequence when weighed against the representational value of yet another Black US secretary of state.

Barbara Lee was conspicuous by her presence among Susan Rice’s fawning CBC boosters. No decent person could support Rice, an unrepentant top operative in a decades-long genocide, for anything except life in prison or an appointment with the gallows.

But the ideology of the Black Misleadership Class – awesomely self-serving and pitifully servile, at the same time – does not allow for decency, and is wholly unfit to guide politics of 40 million people.

The Black political class has given electoral politics a bad name. But that doesn’t mean the vote is useless in the struggle for justice and self-determination.

Glen Ford is executive editor of BlackAgendaReport.com. E-mail him at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.

SHARE

2 COMMENTS

  1. What can I say,you covered so much truth. These Black cowards and Coons are self serving,just like many Black leaders in Africa,who serve the Chinese,Europeans and American White causes;at the expense of their own African people. Lack of God,lack of following exactly what God instructs us to do,is why there is rarely any Black Unity worldwide. Blacks who gain wealth and power,become self serving,instead of serving God. Serving God means giving to the poor,give to anyone who begs,if you have.
    Luke 6 30
    30 Give to everyone who begs from you, and from one who takes away your goods do not demand them back.

    Proverbs 22:16
    Whoever oppresses the poor to increase his own wealth, or gives to the rich, will only come to poverty.

    Matthew 19:21
    Jesus said to him, “If you would be perfect, go, sell what you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me.”

  2. This government did admit to weapons for drugs that made it to the during the contra vs sandinistas conflict.
    The way you talk about leading blacks it’s no different than what you see in the Ku Klux Klan page. Who are you talking about African leaders in Africa?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here