There’s a box of odious and discredited myths that hold that African-Americans have less wealth and higher rates of poverty, joblessness and other negative social indicators because we ain’t thrifty, because we don’t save and invest like some other folks, because we don’t spend our cash with Black businesses, and we just do not properly manage our collective wealth.
These propositions are fake economics, killed and disproven many times. Now these disreputable myths have been embraced by portions of the #BlackLivesMatter movement.
Debit card solution
During Black History Month, the #BlackLivesMatter folks rolled out, in partnership with OneUnited Bank, their officially branded #BlackLivesMatter debit card, which features the striking portrait of “Amir,” an African boy flanked by the iconic images of 1968 Olympians Tommie John and John Carlos, fists in the air.
The accompanying mini-blizzard of press releases, stories and statements, some accompanied by the hashtag #BlackMoneyMatters, double down on the pernicious nonsense that Black banks and the marshaling of Black spending power are solutions to the economic distress of Black families and communities.
Morgan State University’s Dr. Jared Ball, a prolific scholar whose current work can be found at www.imixwhatilike.org, has done more to document and explain the bogus economics of “Black spending power” than anybody alive. Ball wrote a long and thoughtful Facebook post:
“‘Buying Power’ is a marketing phrase that refers only to the ‘power’ of consumers to purchase what are strictly available goods and as their own report admits, has nothing to do with income or wealth which are the genuine markers of economic condition.
“‘Power’ here has nothing to do with actual economic strength. Nearly all reports/stories related to these numbers refer back to flawed, misleading and misinterpreted research from the Selig Center for Economic Growth at the Terry College of Business housed in the Bank of America Financial Center in Athens, Ga.
“The claim that African America has roughly $1 trillion in ‘buying power’ is an entirely phony myth, like unicorns, democracy or freedom. As explained in detail below, the number is fraudulent, itself derived from equally fraudulent surveys, absurdly interpreted sociological data and – at best – misinterpreted data regarding spending which mostly just ignores the far more sound data regarding wealth and income.
“The myth of ‘buying power’ works to deny the reality of structural, intentional and necessary economic inequality required to maintain society as it is, one that benefits an increasingly decreasing number of people. To do this, the myth functions to falsely blame the poor for being poor. Poverty, the myth encourages, is the result of the poor having little to no ‘financial literacy,’ or as resulting from their bad spending habits, when in reality poverty is an intended result of an economic and social system.”
Ball’s treatise, titled “the Myth of Black Buying Power,” is worth reading. He reveals that “Black buying power” phrase originated as the sales slogan of Black marketers a generation ago who wanted to convince clients they had a lock on the Black market. In the real world, Black America spends 44 percent of its income on rent alone. When you add utilities, transportation, food, clothing, student and consumer debt, there’s next to nothing left to invest.
Patronizing Black banks and other businesses simply will not create the mythical Black-owned entities that will somehow hire millions of now-jobless Black workers to manufacture the cars, computers, cell phones, and other services and goods made by somebody else which African-Americans now consume. Nobody has ever boycotted and shopped their way to freedom.
Lazy demagogues touting this nonsense never explain just how this “buying power” might somehow be intelligently re-directed from utilities, transportation, rent, and whatnot into the coffers of some entity that will “re-invest” in Black communities – because they simply cannot.
Black capitalism won’t cure Black unemployment, either. Karl Marx wrote 170 years ago that capitalist economies always require a large reserve of unemployed workers to depress the wages of those currently employed. That has not changed. So Black unemployment is not a bug in capitalism – it is a core feature.
There’s nothing in the fantastical Black capitalist universe to prevent the gentrification of Black and Brown communities either, because under this economic system, the only value a stable poor or working-class neighborhood possesses is the value which might be realized by flipping it; expelling the current residents; and moving in hotels, stadiums and richer (usually Whiter) inhabitants.
This explains why the Black political class has never been able to offer any alternative model of urban economic development to its low- and moderate-income constituents. Advocates of Black capitalism want us to live in a fantasy world which defines collective effort as shopping Black and using the #BlackLivesMatter debit card at OneUnited Bank.
Just look around
What would real-world collective Black economic effort look like?
None of the pro-capitalist advocates of Black collective economic effort have noticed the Black agricultural cooperatives of the Federation For Southern Cooperatives, which has been around for 50 years, the more recent groundbreaking work of Cooperation Jackson in Jackson, Miss.; or discuss the whys and wherefores of worker-owned cooperative businesses.
An even greater omission is their failure to EVER mention labor unions – just about the only real-world engines for collective economic empowerment ever invented.
The NYC transit workers strike of 2005, when 30,000 mostly Black and Brown workers brought metro New York to a halt defending their health care, pensions and the wages of future workers, is a priceless example of collective action for economic uplift in the real world. That single strike probably bolstered the fortunes of more Black families than all the careers of Oprah and all the other Black billionaires in the US.
Organizers know well that Black women are the most likely to join unions too, followed in order by Black men, then Latino women and Latino men, Asian women and Asian men, then White women and finally White men.
You’d think the responsible heads of #BlackLivesMatter, who claim they are second to nobody when it comes to enabling and boosting the work of women organizers and organized women, would be all over this, training women to be union organizers across the country, and agitating for the repeal and creative violation of laws which make it difficult and almost impossible to organize unions and strike in large swaths of the US. But they’re not.
The portion of #BlackLivesMatter leadership which promotes these fake economic nostrums instead of real-world collective actions like cooperatives and unions can only roll this way because they are unaccountable to anyone but themselves and their funders.
Who funds BLM?
A web page that seems to have been taken down from the Borealis Philanthropy web site explained that Borealis, in cooperation with the Ford Foundation and others, aims to raise $100 million to train the next generation of #BlackLivesMatter leaders.
The rank-and-file activists flying the #BlackLivesMatter banner possess no structural way to bend BLM’s national leaders to their will, or even to express that will. The BLM contraption isn’t made for that.
But it works just fine for reviving the old and discredited myths of Black capitalism, tales which blame the Black poor for poverty and tell us we can and should be saving and shopping our way to freedom.
Bruce Dixon is managing editor of BlackAgendaReport.com. Contact him at firstname.lastname@example.org.