Wanted: Data on people shot each year

Filed under NATIONAL, NEWS

Police, researchers say number needed to address gun  violence in US

BY JUSTIN GEORGE
BALTIMORE SUN/TNS

BALTIMORE — Police chiefs, criminologists and federal officials are calling for better and more accurate data on crime as the nation grapples with gun violence but fails to keep a simple tally of the total number of people shot across the country each year.

A group of people ask a police officer to retrieve personal items inside a home where at least six people were shot, one fatally, on the 8600 block of South Maryland Avenue on Dec. 25 in Chicago.
(ARMANDO L. SANCHEZ/CHICAGO TRIBUNE/TNS)

The FBI takes a census on crime each year with data from local police departments, but many don’t specifically track when people are shot and survive. Those nonfatal shootings are often recorded under a broader category of aggravated assault, which also includes stabbings, serious beatings and other crimes.

Without that information, police and policymakers say, they can’t gauge the full extent of gun violence in America. Homicides are tracked in a distinct category.

“The fact that we don’t count the number of people who are shot is just astonishing because that’s a better barometer of that kind of violence than just homicides,” said Chuck Wexler, the executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum, which helps police departments craft policy and strategies.

Violent crime debate
Violent crime trends came up during this year’s presidential race, as President-elect Donald Trump called attention to a spike in homicides in recent years in a number of U.S. cities, including Baltimore, even as President Barack Obama noted a long-term decline in the nation’s homicide rate.

The debate focused attention on violent crime in America at a time when policing has come under heightened scrutiny after numerous killings of unarmed black men by police.

The lack of more detailed data was flagged last month by the U.S. Department of Justice in an annual report on the state of policing in the United States.

The report noted that police chiefs during recent summits on escalating urban violence recognized that their crime analysis was limited by the fact that not all shootings, such as those that don’t result in a homicide, are tracked.

Different categories
More accurate and immediate data on fatal and nonfatal shootings “could be vital in combating violent crime and in building community trust,” said the report from the department’s Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

Wexler said it’s difficult to discern when an aggravated assault with a deadly weapon means someone was pistol-whipped or shot.

“There are all different kinds of categories, and it’s incredibly important to map hot spots, if you will, or patterns to know if people were shot at or shot or threatened in some way,” he said. “Each of those categories are important.”

Accurate data needed
Some cities are grappling with targeted violence while other cities are struggling with gang warfare in which bullets are shot into crowds indiscriminately, said Daniel Webster, director of the Center for Gun Policy and Research at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Each scenario requires different policing strategies, he said, and making those decisions requires accurate data.

“We first need to define our problems accurately,” Webster said.

Police chiefs, including Baltimore Police Commissioner Kevin Davis, believe a requirement to specifically track shootings should have been implemented nationwide years ago.

‘Unfinished business’
Baltimore began recording nonfatal shootings as a separate crime category in 2000.

Davis, in a recent speech to business leaders at the Greater Baltimore Committee, referred to nonfatal shootings as “unfinished business,” stressing that in Baltimore, these crimes are often the start or part of a string of shootings that can end with homicides.

Milwaukee Police Chief Edward A. Flynn, whose department also collects statistics on nonfatal shootings, said that relying on a broad category of aggravated assault data is an ineffective way to spot and address trends in gun violence.

“If we can reliably extract nonfatal shooting data across jurisdictions,” he said, “we will have a much more useful comparative metric.”

Uniform Crime Report
The information collected by the FBI from local police departments across the country is compiled in the Uniform Crime Report.

The report, which hasn’t changed significantly since it was started in 1930, is one of two crime surveys the agency conducts. Both provide incomplete information, the DOJ report said.

“The two currently available crime databases run by the federal government cannot provide high-quality and promptly available data about the incidence of crime,” the report said.

The second crime database run by the FBI, the National Incident Based Reporting System, is a program created in 1988 to record more specific national crime data than the Uniform Crime Report. But only about one-third of all U.S. law enforcement agencies use the new system, the DOJ report noted, and it doesn’t require agencies to report nonfatal shootings as a separate category.

Congressional act?
Both the Department of Justice and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provide annual estimates of nonfatal shootings, but the information is based on limited surveys.

“More accurate and complete data would definitely help efforts to prevent firearm violence,” said Garen J. Wintemute, an emergency department attending physician and the director of the Violence Prevention Research Program at the University of California-Davis Health System in California. “Our current estimates of nonfatal shootings are based on a small sample of emergency departments.”

Stephen G. Fischer Jr., FBI chief of multimedia productions, said changes to the Uniform Crime Report system could require Congress to act.

The agency also has a special policy advisory board to review issues raised by law enforcement partners and other agencies. The board can then make recommendations to the FBI director.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *