Why won’t Black politicians fight for the US Postal Service?

Filed under COMMENTARIES

00_brucedixonTwenty, 40 and 60 years ago, a job at the Post Office was, for African-Americans, the ticket to something like middle class stability.

Since people with steady and well-paid work, who don’t have long commutes were more able to participate in community-building and sustaining activities Black postal workers were well-represented in a wide range of civic, voluntary and political organizations from the 1940s clear to the end of the 20th century.

As an activist and organizer in Chicago of the 1970s and 1980s, I learned countless lessons from postal workers who took the lead in struggles against police brutality, for fair housing and opposition to Chicago’s long running municipal dictators, the Daley regime.

When I moved to Atlanta at the end of 2000, I learned about another postal worker, John Wesley Dobbs who used to be called the mayor of Auburn Avenue, and was so well known that you could mail a letter from overseas addressed to “John Wesley Dobbs, USA” and he would receive it.

Target for privatizers
It was predictable that when, in the 1980s, public policy took a turn against steady jobs at good wages, to force more and more Americans, particularly African-Americans into less and less secure jobs at lower and lower wages, at the same time it vastly expanded the prison state and made welfare as scarce and punitive as possible, that the Postal Service, a monopoly enshrined in the Constitution itself, became a target for privatizers.

In the ‘80s, ‘90s and the new century, Democrats and Republicans in Congress and successive White Houses passed special legislation and rules that restricted the postal service while enabling UPS and Federal Express to take some of its most lucrative traffic.

Massachusetts liberal Democrat Ted Kennedy took the lead in passing regulation specifically crafted to make unionization impossible at FedEx.

The death blow to the postal service may have been struck during the Bush administration, when Congress saddled the postal service with the absurd requirement to fully fund all pensions 70 years in advance, for workers yet unborn.

It’s the end game now, with greedy privatizers like the husband of Senator Diane Feinstein and others snatching inner-city properties the postal service is forced to sell far below their value to fulfill its legal directive to self-destruct.

Where’s the rally?
Still, I keep wondering when I’ll hear members of our current Black political class speak up for the postal service and those good jobs postal workers had that made them the bedrock of Black communities and civic activism everywhere.

I wonder why they haven’t organized forums and conferences and petitions and mass meetings to preserve the last of what used to be the good jobs that made them a potent leading force in African-American communities across the country, and even made some of their own careers possible.

Barack Obama doesn’t have a majority in Congress. But his favorite president, Ronald Reagan, never had one either, but it rarely stopped [him] from picking the fights he wanted to win, and often winning them.

The American people as a whole DO reject privatization any time they’re polled on it. That’s why the Obama regime and its collaborators dare not call what they’re doing to public education or the broadcast spectrum “privatization.”

The fight to halt the privatization of the postal service is certainly one the Black political class, with or without the president could pick and possibly win, or at least slow down and delay for years. But fighting for good jobs for ordinary people just isn’t our current Black political leadership.

No doubt John Wesley Dobbs and the postal workers I used to know in the ’70s and ‘80s, are rolling over in their graves.

Bruce A. Dixon is managing editor at Black Agenda Report, and a state committee member of the Georgia Green Party. He can be reached at bruce.dixon@blackagendareport.com.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login